klisp

commit 438a10381014f6eaf70f344eabdbd8a09420892b
parent c41d2ac4ae9f11a3324ed497a162749412416677
Author: Andres Navarro <canavarro82@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:54:17 -0300

Added some comments to the tests.

Diffstat:
M
src/tests/test-all.k
 | 
3
++-
M
src/tests/test-helpers.k
 | 
7
+++++++

2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/tests/test-all.k b/src/tests/test-all.k
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
 (load "tests/environments.k")
 (load "tests/environment-mutation.k")
 (load "tests/combiners.k")
-(load "tests/encapsulations.k")
+;; XXX Oto, you forgot to add tests/encapsulations.k to the repo!
+;;(load "tests/encapsulations.k")
 (load "tests/numbers.k")
 (load "tests/strings.k")
 (load "tests/characters.k")
diff --git a/src/tests/test-helpers.k b/src/tests/test-helpers.k
@@ -41,6 +41,13 @@
 ($define! immutable-string?
   ($lambda (obj) ($and? (string? obj) (not? (nonempty-mutable-string? obj)))))
 
+;; XXX/TODO Some of these could be removed if we had eager comprehension in
+;; check.k (which would also complete the srfi-78 implementation). The problem
+;; is that the design adaptation from macros to operatives should be taken
+;; with some care. I intended to do it before the remaining tests, but since
+;; Oto Havle went ahead and wrote the tests without it, they have lost some
+;; priority. Andres Navarro 
+
 ;; ($false-for-all? P XS) evaluates to #t iff (P X) evaluates
 ;; to #f for all members X of the list XS.
 ;;